finishing-a-development-branch¶
End-of-branch workflow covering final verification, changelog/version release prep, PR creation, merge strategy selection, and cleanup. Presents structured integration options (merge, PR, park, or discard) after confirming all tests pass. A core spellbook capability for cleanly completing feature work and integrating it into the main branch.
Auto-invocation: Your coding assistant will automatically invoke this skill when it detects a matching trigger.
Use when implementation is complete, tests pass, and you need to decide the integration path. Also use when asked to prepare a branch for release: 'update changelog', 'bump version', 'bump patch version', 'make sure changelog is correct', 'make sure version is correct'. Triggers: 'done with this branch', 'ready to merge', 'ship it', 'wrap this up', 'how should I integrate this', 'what next after implementation'. NOT for: PR creation mechanics (use creating-issues-and-pull-requests) or deciding whether to merge (use finishing-a-development-branch first).
Origin
This skill originated from obra/superpowers.
Workflow Diagram¶
Finishing a Development Branch - Diagrams¶
Workflow for completing a development branch: verifies tests pass, determines base branch, presents 4 structured integration options (merge, PR, keep, discard), executes the chosen option via subagent, and performs worktree cleanup where applicable.
Overview Diagram¶
High-level flow from entry through the 5 steps to terminal states.
flowchart TD
subgraph Legend
L1[Process]
L2{Decision}
L3([Terminal])
L4[/Subagent Dispatch/]
L5[[Quality Gate]]
end
style L4 fill:#4a9eff,color:#fff
style L5 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style L3 fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
Entry([Skill Entry:<br>Tests must pass]) --> AutoCheck{Autonomous<br>mode?}
AutoCheck -->|Yes| PostImpl{post_impl<br>setting?}
AutoCheck -->|No| Step1
PostImpl -->|auto_pr| DirectPR[Skip to Option 2]
PostImpl -->|stop| StopReport([Report completion,<br>no action])
PostImpl -->|offer_options| Step1
PostImpl -->|unset| DefaultPR[Default to Option 2.<br>Log decision.]
DirectPR --> Step4
DefaultPR --> Step4
Step1[[Step 1:<br>Verify Tests]] --> TestResult{Tests<br>pass?}
TestResult -->|No| TestFail([STOP:<br>Fix failures first])
TestResult -->|Yes| Step2
Step2[Step 2:<br>Determine Base Branch] --> MergeBase{Base branch<br>detected?}
MergeBase -->|Yes| Step3
MergeBase -->|Ambiguous| AskBase[Ask user to<br>confirm base branch] --> Step3
Step3[Step 3:<br>Present 4 Options] --> UserChoice{User selects<br>option}
UserChoice -->|Option 1| Step4
UserChoice -->|Option 2| Step4
UserChoice -->|Option 3| Step4
UserChoice -->|Option 4| Step4
Step4[/Step 4: Execute Choice<br>finish-branch-execute/] --> Step5{Option 3<br>selected?}
Step5 -->|Yes| KeepDone([Branch kept.<br>Worktree preserved.])
Step5 -->|No| Step5Cleanup[/Step 5: Cleanup Worktree<br>finish-branch-cleanup/]
Step5Cleanup --> SelfCheck[[Self-Check:<br>5-point checklist]]
SelfCheck --> Done([Integration<br>complete])
style Entry fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style StopReport fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style TestFail fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style KeepDone fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style Done fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style Step1 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style SelfCheck fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style Step4 fill:#4a9eff,color:#fff
style Step5Cleanup fill:#4a9eff,color:#fff
Detail: Step 4 - Execute Choice (finish-branch-execute)¶
Decision tree for each of the four integration options dispatched as a subagent.
flowchart TD
subgraph Legend
L1[Process]
L2{Decision}
L3([Terminal])
L4[[Quality Gate]]
end
style L4 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style L3 fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
Entry{Which option<br>was chosen?} -->|Option 1| O1_Checkout
Entry -->|Option 2| O2_Push
Entry -->|Option 3| O3_Report
Entry -->|Option 4| O4_Confirm
%% Option 1: Merge Locally
O1_Checkout[git checkout base-branch] --> O1_Pull[git pull]
O1_Pull --> O1_Merge[git merge feature-branch]
O1_Merge --> O1_Test[[Run test suite<br>on merged result]]
O1_Test --> O1_TestResult{Post-merge<br>tests pass?}
O1_TestResult -->|No| O1_Fail([STOP: Report failure.<br>Do NOT delete branch.])
O1_TestResult -->|Yes| O1_Delete[git branch -d feature-branch]
O1_Delete --> O1_Done([Invoke cleanup])
%% Option 2: Push and Create PR
O2_Push[git push -u origin<br>feature-branch] --> O2_PushOK{Push<br>succeeded?}
O2_PushOK -->|No| O2_Fail([STOP: Report error.<br>No cleanup.])
O2_PushOK -->|Yes| O2_PR[gh pr create<br>with summary + test plan]
O2_PR --> O2_PROK{PR creation<br>succeeded?}
O2_PROK -->|No| O2_Fail
O2_PROK -->|Yes| O2_Report[Report PR URL to user]
O2_Report --> O2_Done([Invoke cleanup])
%% Option 3: Keep As-Is
O3_Report([Report: Branch kept.<br>Worktree preserved.<br>No cleanup invoked.])
%% Option 4: Discard
O4_Confirm[[Require typed<br>'discard' confirmation]] --> O4_Check{Exact string<br>'discard' received?}
O4_Check -->|No / Partial| O4_Reject([STOP: Do not proceed.<br>Ask again.])
O4_Check -->|Yes| O4_Checkout[git checkout base-branch]
O4_Checkout --> O4_Delete[git branch -D feature-branch]
O4_Delete --> O4_Done([Invoke cleanup])
style O1_Test fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style O4_Confirm fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style O1_Fail fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style O2_Fail fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style O4_Reject fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style O3_Report fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style O1_Done fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style O2_Done fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style O4_Done fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
Detail: Step 5 - Cleanup Worktree (finish-branch-cleanup)¶
Worktree detection and removal logic, gated by option selection.
flowchart TD
subgraph Legend
L1[Process]
L2{Decision}
L3([Terminal])
L4[[Quality Gate]]
end
style L4 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style L3 fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
Entry{Which option<br>was executed?} -->|Option 3| Skip([No cleanup.<br>Worktree stays intact.])
Entry -->|Option 1, 2, or 4| Detect[Detect worktree:<br>git worktree list]
Detect --> InWorktree{Output matches<br>current branch?}
InWorktree -->|No| NoWT([Not in a worktree.<br>Nothing to remove.])
InWorktree -->|Yes| Remove[git worktree remove path]
Remove --> RemoveOK{Removal<br>succeeded?}
RemoveOK -->|Yes| Done([Worktree removed.<br>Integration complete.])
RemoveOK -->|No| CheckDirty{Uncommitted<br>changes detected?}
CheckDirty -->|Yes| WarnUser[[Warn user.<br>Do NOT force-remove.]]
CheckDirty -->|No| OtherError([Report error.<br>Do NOT force-remove.])
WarnUser --> AskForce{User confirms<br>force removal?}
AskForce -->|Yes| ForceRemove[git worktree remove --force]
AskForce -->|No| Preserve([Worktree preserved<br>per user decision.])
ForceRemove --> Done
style Skip fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style NoWT fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style Done fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style Preserve fill:#51cf66,color:#fff
style OtherError fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style WarnUser fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
Legend¶
| Color | Meaning |
|---|---|
Blue (#4a9eff) |
Subagent dispatch |
Red (#ff6b6b) |
Quality gate / stop condition |
Green (#51cf66) |
Success terminal |
Cross-Reference Table¶
| Overview Node | Detail Diagram | Source Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Verify Tests | Overview only (single gate) | SKILL.md lines 82-107 |
| Step 2: Determine Base Branch | Overview only (single step) | SKILL.md lines 109-115 |
| Step 3: Present 4 Options | Overview only (user interaction) | SKILL.md lines 117-130 |
| Step 4: Execute Choice | Detail: Step 4 - Execute Choice | finish-branch-execute.md |
| Step 5: Cleanup Worktree | Detail: Step 5 - Cleanup Worktree | finish-branch-cleanup.md |
| Autonomous Mode | Overview (AutoCheck / PostImpl nodes) | SKILL.md lines 44-59 |
| Self-Check | Overview (SelfCheck node) | SKILL.md lines 173-184 |
Skill Content¶
# Finishing a Development Branch
<ROLE>
Release Engineer. Your reputation depends on clean integrations that never break main or lose work. A merge that breaks the build is a public failure. A discard without confirmation is unforgivable.
</ROLE>
**Announce:** "Using finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
## Invariant Principles
1. **Tests Gate Everything** - Never present options until tests pass. Never merge without verifying tests on merged result.
2. **Structured Choice Over Open Questions** - Present exactly 5 options, never "what should I do?"
3. **Destruction Requires Proof** - Option 5 (Discard) demands typed "discard" confirmation. No shortcuts.
4. **Worktree Lifecycle Matches Work State** - Cleanup only for Options 1 (merged) and 5 (discarded). Keep for Options 2, 3, and 4.
---
## Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Passing test suite | Yes | Tests must pass before this skill can proceed |
| Feature branch | Yes | Current branch with completed implementation |
| Base branch | No | Branch to merge into (auto-detected if unset) |
| `post_impl` setting | No | Autonomous mode directive (auto_pr, offer_options, stop) |
## Outputs
| Output | Type | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|
| Integration result | Action | Merge, PR, preserved branch, or discarded branch |
| PR URL | Inline | GitHub PR URL (Options 2, 3 only) |
| Worktree state | State | Removed (Options 1, 5) or preserved (Options 2, 3, 4) |
---
## Autonomous Mode
Check context for autonomous mode indicators: "Mode: AUTONOMOUS", "autonomous mode", or `post_impl` preference.
| `post_impl` value | Behavior |
|-------------------|----------|
| `auto_pr` | Skip Step 3, execute Option 2 directly |
| `offer_options` | Present options normally |
| `stop` | Skip Step 3, report completion without action |
| (unset in autonomous) | Default to Option 2. Log: "Autonomous mode: defaulting to PR creation" |
<CRITICAL>
**Circuit breakers (always pause):**
- Tests failing - NEVER proceed
- Option 5 (Discard) selected - ALWAYS require typed confirmation, never auto-execute
</CRITICAL>
---
## Branch-Relative Documentation
<CRITICAL>
Changelogs, PR titles, PR descriptions, commit messages, and code comments describe the delta between current branch HEAD and the merge base with the target branch. Nothing else exists. The only reality is `git diff $(git merge-base HEAD <target>)...HEAD`.
</CRITICAL>
**Required behavior:**
- Derive all changelog/PR/commit content from the merge base diff at time of writing.
- When HEAD changes (new commits, rebases, amends), re-evaluate and actively delete stale entries. Never accumulate entries session-by-session.
- Code comments describe the present. Git describes the past. No "changed from X to Y", "previously did Z", "refactored from old approach", "CRITICAL FIX: now does X instead of Y".
- Test: "Does this comment make sense to someone reading the code for the first time, with no knowledge of prior implementation?" If no, delete it.
**The rare exception:** A comment may reference external historical facts that explain non-obvious constraints (e.g., "SQLite < 3.35 doesn't support RETURNING"). Reframe as a present-tense constraint, not a change narrative.
---
## Release Prep: Changelog and Version
When the user says "update changelog", "bump version", "make sure version is correct", or any variation, treat it as **prepare this branch for release**. Always do both changelog and version together.
### Changelog
1. Compute the branch diff: `git diff $(git merge-base HEAD <target>)...HEAD`
2. Derive entries from that diff. Each logical user-facing change gets one entry.
3. Use [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/) format with the project's existing categories (Added, Changed, Fixed, etc.).
4. If bumping the version, entries go under the new version heading (e.g., `## [1.2.3] - YYYY-MM-DD`). If not bumping, entries go under `[Unreleased]`.
5. If the project does not have a CHANGELOG.md, check the project's AGENTS.md for changelog conventions before creating one.
### Version Bump
1. Compare the version in `pyproject.toml` (or the project's version file) against `origin/main` (or the merge target). If already bumped, trust it.
2. If not bumped, infer the level from the branch diff:
- **Major**: Breaking changes to public API
- **Minor**: New features, new public API surface
- **Patch**: Bug fixes, documentation, internal refactors
3. If you cannot confidently infer the level, ask the user.
4. If you infer **major**, confirm with the user before applying (unless in autonomous mode).
### "Make sure X is correct"
"Make sure changelog is correct" and "make sure version is correct" mean the same as "update changelog" and "bump version". Derive from the branch diff, fix what is wrong, add what is missing.
---
## The Process
### Step 1: Verify Tests
<analysis>
Before presenting options:
- Do tests pass on current branch?
- What is the base branch?
- Am I in a worktree?
</analysis>
```bash
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
```
**If tests fail:**
```
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
```
STOP. Do not proceed to Step 2.
**If tests pass:** Continue to Step 2.
### Step 2: Determine Base Branch
```bash
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
```
If the command fails or is ambiguous, ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
### Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 5 options:
```
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Push, create a PR, and do the PR dance (iterative CI + bot review until merge-ready)
4. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
5. Discard this work
Which option?
```
**Don't add explanation** - keep options concise.
### Step 4: Execute Choice
**Dispatch subagent** with command: `finish-branch-execute`
Provide context: chosen option number, feature branch name, base branch name, worktree path (if applicable).
### Step 5: Cleanup Worktree
**Dispatch subagent** with command: `finish-branch-cleanup`
Provide context: chosen option number, worktree path. Note: Option 4 skips cleanup entirely.
---
## Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------|
| 1. Merge locally | Yes | - | - | Yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | Yes | Yes | - |
| 3. Create PR + PR dance | - | Yes | Yes | - |
| 4. Keep as-is | - | - | Yes | - |
| 5. Discard | - | - | - | Yes (force) |
---
## Anti-Patterns
<FORBIDDEN>
- Proceeding with failing tests
- Merging without post-merge test verification
- Deleting branches without typed "discard" confirmation
- Force-pushing without explicit user request
- Presenting open-ended questions instead of structured options
- Cleaning up worktrees for Options 2, 3, or 4
- Accepting partial confirmation for Option 5
</FORBIDDEN>
---
## Self-Check
<reflection>
Before completing:
- [ ] Tests pass on current branch
- [ ] Tests pass after merge (Option 1 only)
- [ ] User explicitly selected one of the 4 options
- [ ] Typed "discard" received (Option 5 only)
- [ ] Worktree cleaned only for Options 1 or 5
IF ANY unchecked: STOP and fix.
</reflection>
---
## Integration
**Called by:**
- **executing-plans** (Step 5) - After all batches complete
- **executing-plans --mode subagent** (Step 7) - After all tasks complete in subagent mode
**Pairs with:**
- **using-git-worktrees** - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
<FINAL_EMPHASIS>
You are a Release Engineer. Clean integrations that never break main and never lose work without confirmation are your entire reputation. A test-gated, confirmation-gated, option-structured handoff is the only acceptable delivery. Anything less is negligence.
</FINAL_EMPHASIS>